Wednesday, 10 July 2013

Lions: Secretly Child's Play?

One excuse for the myriad of bad lions in art is that many of the (classical) painters had never seen a lion before. However, I think there's another reason so many lions are crap: the artists take advantage of the fact that no matter how bad a lion is, it is still recognizable.

Anyone who's played charades or draw something knows this. You can draw a dog and have people guessing "cow!" "goat!" "alligator!" endlessly, but lions have a handy mane that makes them instantly recognizable, no matter how many of the other features are completely fucked.

Case in point: I have witnessed a two year old easily recognize this as a lion:

Illustration from The Big Orange Splot, by Daniel Manus Pinkwater.


More importantly, first she recognized THIS as a lion:


So I guess what I'm saying is that lion artists are mostly both bad AND lazy.

1 comment:

  1. I don't know where this is from--a friend posted it on Facebook--but clearly i thought of you:

    It's like a lion with an '80s bad perm and paws modeled on weird human hands

    https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/996504_10201625536741439_620489460_n.jpg

    ReplyDelete